Difference between revisions of "Talk:Proposal to Repeal Bylaw II.2.7"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
m (-- ~~~~) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == | + | == Comments == |
| − | + | I thought the reason this Bylaw was added was that no government agency can join the Federation without it. I didn't think groups from most universities and businesses could join either. | |
| + | |||
| + | This might not be the best way to address the problem anyway; because we have the protection provided by this Bylaw, couldn't we change what counts as quorum? I thought we already changed the definition of "voting" member, so groups would transition to "inactive" state if they missed a vote or two and wouldn't be counted in the next quorum count. If we didn't, perhaps we should? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:HowardBurrows|HowardBurrows]] 16:16, 3 January 2011 (MST) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:16, January 3, 2011
Comments
I thought the reason this Bylaw was added was that no government agency can join the Federation without it. I didn't think groups from most universities and businesses could join either.
This might not be the best way to address the problem anyway; because we have the protection provided by this Bylaw, couldn't we change what counts as quorum? I thought we already changed the definition of "voting" member, so groups would transition to "inactive" state if they missed a vote or two and wouldn't be counted in the next quorum count. If we didn't, perhaps we should?
HowardBurrows 16:16, 3 January 2011 (MST)
