Difference between revisions of "AQ Community Meeting Summer 2009 Schedule"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[July_7-10%2C_2009%2C_ESIP_Federation_Meeting%2C_Santa_Barbara%2C_CA|Main Summer 2009 Meeting Page]] >> [[Air Quality Community Summer 2009 Meeting]]</small> | [[July_7-10%2C_2009%2C_ESIP_Federation_Meeting%2C_Santa_Barbara%2C_CA|Main Summer 2009 Meeting Page]] >> [[Air Quality Community Summer 2009 Meeting]]</small> | ||
|}<br /> | |}<br /> | ||
| − | == | + | ==New Improved Schedule== |
| − | We | + | This is not final. Some remaining concerns: |
| − | A version of this in Excel is [[Media:SB schedule.xls|here]] (.xls) | + | * Does it give OAQPS enough time for feedback etc.? |
| + | * I'd like an explicit slot for the Non-AQ folks (Josh Lieberman, Raj Singh). | ||
| + | * We will stay flexible about adding a few more folks to Wednesday presentations | ||
| + | |||
| + | We'll be contacting proposed presenters. | ||
| + | A version of this in Excel is [[Media:SB schedule B.xls|here]] (.xls) | ||
| + | The previous version is [[Media:SB schedule.xls|here]] (.xls) | ||
{| {{table}} | {| {{table}} | ||
| − | | align=" | + | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Block''' |
| − | | align=" | + | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Time''' |
| − | | align=" | + | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Subject''' |
| − | | align=" | + | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Presenter''' |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | '''Block 1'''||1:00||Welcome | + | | '''Block 1'''||1:00||Welcome, Objectives, Proposed Approach||Sweeny |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | ||||…for quick briefing sessions, take clarifying questions, hold discussion till end|| |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | '''Goals & Policy Overview'''||1:15||GEO Perspective||Friedl |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||1:30||OAQPS perspective||Scheffe | + | | Weds. Afternoon||1:30||OAQPS perspective||Scheffe |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||1: | + | | ||1:45||EPA GEO perspective||Young |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || | + | | ||2:00||NASA||Hilsenrath |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||2: | + | | ||2:15||USGEO||Lindsay |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| ||2:30||ESIP AQ||Falke | | ||2:30||ESIP AQ||Falke | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||2: | + | | ||2:45||room for one more?|| |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || | + | | ||3:00||BREAK|| |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || | + | | ----------||------||------------------------||------------- |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | ||||For following sessions take down questions and review together at the end|| |
|- | |- | ||
| '''Block 2'''||3:30||AIP AQ infrastructure ||Robinson | | '''Block 2'''||3:30||AIP AQ infrastructure ||Robinson | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | '''Technical & Strategic Happenings'''|| | + | | '''Technical & Strategic Happenings'''||||Ross Report*||Sweeny* |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || | + | | ||||OAQPS strategy*||Mintz* |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Weds. Afternoon|| | + | | Weds. Afternoon||||EPA Earth*||Young* |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || | + | | |||| *Above three talks could be combined or shortened|| |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || | + | | ||||VIEWS & CMAS||Schichtel, McClure, or Shankar |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || | + | | ||||HTAP Network||Husar |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | |||||| | + | | ||5:00||Review questions and start discussion on cross-cutting theames||Sweeny |
|- | |- | ||
| ||5:30||Recess|| | | ||5:30||Recess|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ---------||-----||--------------||-------- | + | | ----------||------||------------------------||------------- |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | '''Block 3'''||9:00||Funding Agency Perspectives on User Needs and Agency Roles||Sweeny & Panel: Friedl, Scheffe, McCabe, Husar, Falke |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ''' | + | | '''Common Themes, Needs/Opportunities'''|||||| |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | Thurs. Morning||9:30||Brainstorm and discussion on areas of interest and opportunity from Day 1 themes... Gaps? Use Cases?|| |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | |||||| |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | ||10:00||Break|| |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || | + | | ----------||------||------------------------||------------- |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | Block 4||10:30||Facilitated Discussion||Sweeny |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ''' | + | | '''Barriers and Practical Progress'''||||What are barriers that prevent us from achieving those opportunities?|| |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | Thurs. Morning|||| Walk through how concrete progress could occur in some example areas - what incentives/connections/infrastructure are needed? || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | |||||| | + | | ||||Generate examples of real improvements that could be made, to make systems interoperate || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | |||||| | + | | ||12:30||Lunch|| |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | ----------||------||------------------------||------------- |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | '''Block 5'''||2:00||Review of AM discussion and ID of key issues/opportunities/actions|| |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | Review of AM|||||| |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | Thurs. Afternoon|||||| |
|- | |- | ||
| |||||| | | |||||| | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | '''Block 6'''||2:30||An opportunity for the community to offer feedback on the GCI, the architecture of GEOSS, and the process and priorities for GEO and USGEO||Friedl, Young, Lindsay | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | '''Feedback for USGEO and GEO'''|||||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Thurs. Afternoon|||||| | | Thurs. Afternoon|||||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || | + | | ||tbd||Break|| |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ---------||-----||--------------||-------- | + | | ----------||------||------------------------||------------- |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | '''Block | + | | '''Block 7'''||tbd + 20||Where does ESIP-AQ go next, over the next 4 months / 1 year? How do we build the Community of Practice and reach out, nationally and internationally, to capitilize on these opportunities? What concrete activities should the CoP take on?|| |
|- | |- | ||
| '''Where does ESIP-AQ go next?'''|||||| | | '''Where does ESIP-AQ go next?'''|||||| | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Thurs. Afternoon|||||| | | Thurs. Afternoon|||||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | + | | |||| | |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||5:30||Adjourn | + | | ||5:30||Adjourn |
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 09:25, June 11, 2009
| Main ESIP page >> Main AQ WG page
Main Summer 2009 Meeting Page >> Air Quality Community Summer 2009 Meeting |
New Improved Schedule
This is not final. Some remaining concerns:
- Does it give OAQPS enough time for feedback etc.?
- I'd like an explicit slot for the Non-AQ folks (Josh Lieberman, Raj Singh).
- We will stay flexible about adding a few more folks to Wednesday presentations
We'll be contacting proposed presenters. A version of this in Excel is here (.xls) The previous version is here (.xls)
| Block | Time | Subject | Presenter |
| Block 1 | 1:00 | Welcome, Objectives, Proposed Approach | Sweeny |
| …for quick briefing sessions, take clarifying questions, hold discussion till end | |||
| Goals & Policy Overview | 1:15 | GEO Perspective | Friedl |
| Weds. Afternoon | 1:30 | OAQPS perspective | Scheffe |
| 1:45 | EPA GEO perspective | Young | |
| 2:00 | NASA | Hilsenrath | |
| 2:15 | USGEO | Lindsay | |
| 2:30 | ESIP AQ | Falke | |
| 2:45 | room for one more? | ||
| 3:00 | BREAK | ||
| ---------- | ------ | ------------------------ | ------------- |
| For following sessions take down questions and review together at the end | |||
| Block 2 | 3:30 | AIP AQ infrastructure | Robinson |
| Technical & Strategic Happenings | Ross Report* | Sweeny* | |
| OAQPS strategy* | Mintz* | ||
| Weds. Afternoon | EPA Earth* | Young* | |
| *Above three talks could be combined or shortened | |||
| VIEWS & CMAS | Schichtel, McClure, or Shankar | ||
| HTAP Network | Husar | ||
| 5:00 | Review questions and start discussion on cross-cutting theames | Sweeny | |
| 5:30 | Recess | ||
| ---------- | ------ | ------------------------ | ------------- |
| Block 3 | 9:00 | Funding Agency Perspectives on User Needs and Agency Roles | Sweeny & Panel: Friedl, Scheffe, McCabe, Husar, Falke |
| Common Themes, Needs/Opportunities | |||
| Thurs. Morning | 9:30 | Brainstorm and discussion on areas of interest and opportunity from Day 1 themes... Gaps? Use Cases? | |
| 10:00 | Break | ||
| ---------- | ------ | ------------------------ | ------------- |
| Block 4 | 10:30 | Facilitated Discussion | Sweeny |
| Barriers and Practical Progress | What are barriers that prevent us from achieving those opportunities? | ||
| Thurs. Morning | Walk through how concrete progress could occur in some example areas - what incentives/connections/infrastructure are needed? | ||
| Generate examples of real improvements that could be made, to make systems interoperate | |||
| 12:30 | Lunch | ||
| ---------- | ------ | ------------------------ | ------------- |
| Block 5 | 2:00 | Review of AM discussion and ID of key issues/opportunities/actions | |
| Review of AM | |||
| Thurs. Afternoon | |||
| Block 6 | 2:30 | An opportunity for the community to offer feedback on the GCI, the architecture of GEOSS, and the process and priorities for GEO and USGEO | Friedl, Young, Lindsay |
| Feedback for USGEO and GEO | |||
| Thurs. Afternoon | |||
| tbd | Break | ||
| ---------- | ------ | ------------------------ | ------------- |
| Block 7 | tbd + 20 | Where does ESIP-AQ go next, over the next 4 months / 1 year? How do we build the Community of Practice and reach out, nationally and internationally, to capitilize on these opportunities? What concrete activities should the CoP take on? | |
| Where does ESIP-AQ go next? | |||
| Thurs. Afternoon | |||
| 5:30 | Adjourn | ||